During development I encountered a caveat: Opus 4.5 can’t test or view a terminal output, especially one with unusual functional requirements. But despite being blind, it knew enough about the ratatui terminal framework to implement whatever UI changes I asked. There were a large number of UI bugs that likely were caused by Opus’s inability to create test cases, namely failures to account for scroll offsets resulting in incorrect click locations. As someone who spent 5 years as a black box Software QA Engineer who was unable to review the underlying code, this situation was my specialty. I put my QA skills to work by messing around with miditui, told Opus any errors with occasionally a screenshot, and it was able to fix them easily. I do not believe that these bugs are inherently due to LLM agents being better or worse than humans as humans are most definitely capable of making the same mistakes. Even though I myself am adept at finding the bugs and offering solutions, I don’t believe that I would inherently avoid causing similar bugs were I to code such an interactive app without AI assistance: QA brain is different from software engineering brain.
Фото: Thaier Al-Sudani / Reuters
刘强东长期擅长的正是供应链组织与规模化管理。他在粤港澳大湾区布局制造基地与总部，押注的是区域产业协同。一旦核心部件实现本地化配套，制造成本有望下降，行业集中度也可能提升。，详情可参考WPS官方版本下载
Buy this cartoon | David’s favourite work of 2025
В Финляндии предупредили об опасном шаге ЕС против России09:28
A complex spec creates complex edge cases. The Web Platform Tests for streams span over 70 test files, and while comprehensive testing is a good thing, what's telling is what needs to be tested.。业内人士推荐Line官方版本下载作为进阶阅读